|
Written by editor
|
|
Monday, 02 May 2011 10:33 |
According to the new law prepared by the Ministry of Justice for final discussion in Czech Parliament the right of comand for distrait of property will be moved newly in judicial officers´ hands.
There will be no need of adjucation any more. This should be more effective for both sides - judges and judicial officers. To stop the unnecessary and restrained administrative and this way to make the work faster.
We will inform you when this law will be applied.
|
|
|
Monday, 04 April 2011 12:39 |
|
Minutes of UIHJ-Eurodanube meeting, 3th March 2011
Radisson Blu Hotel Olümpia , Tallinn
Juraj Podkonicky opens the EuroDanube meeting, with warm welcome he remarked that the meeting celebrates the 10th anniversary of Estonian Chamber. He also pointed out the perfect organization of the meeting by estonian chamber and especially Elin Villipus, Chief of organizing committee and thanked for the invitation to beautiful Estonian Capital Tallinn.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
Friday, 10 December 2010 11:16 |
Hungary is the first Eurodanube Member who answered the questions asked by Mr. Peter Molnár, President of Slovakian Chamber.
Here they are:
1 . Is judicial officer in your country entitled to perform its activity in entire territory of the state or is his authority territorialy limited ? (if yes, please specify limitations)
The cases in progress in a specific judicial district are handled by the judicial officer having jurisdiction for the county in question; the cases in progress in Budapest and in Pest County are handled by the judicial officer having jurisdiction for Budapest and Pest County.
If an enforcement procedure initiated in a specific district involves the attachment of an immovable property, the judicial officer having jurisdiction for that district implements the procedure throughout the entire country.
2. Is it a right of creditor to choose a judicial officer who will be enforcing creditor´s claim or is it a court (or other state authority) who assign a case to a judicial officer for enforcement?
The court or body issuing the enforcement order conveys the enforcement order, to the judicial officer of jurisdiction by reference to the domicile or registered address of the judgment debtor, and to the judgment creditor.
3. Is judicial officer in your country entitled to enforce also tax claims of (i) state authorities and (ii) territorial self-administration authorities? If yes, is judicial officer entitled to enforce these tax claims exclusively, or alongside of a state (or territorial self-administration) tax authority?
Yes, he is, however, not exclusively, but based on bilateral agreement between each authority and each judicial officer.
4. Is in your country as condition for appointment of judicial officer necessary to absolve successfully any kind of selection procedure?
Judicial officers are selected by way of tender.
In judicial districts with a majority of some national or ethnic minority, the candidate who has command of the language of such minority is preferred. The judicial officer who has been acting substitute in the judicial district in question is also given preferential treatment.
Tenders are announced by the Chamber. The Chamber interviews the candidates and makes its proposal for appointment.
The minister examines the applications of the first three candidates proposed by the chamber, based on which to make the final decision to fill the judicial officer's office.
|
|
Monday, 22 November 2010 10:46 |
The 4th EURODANUBE group meeting was held in Prague on October 20th – 22nd 2010. The conference was organized by the Judicial Officers Chamber of the Czech Republic under the patronage of Czech Parliament´s House of Commons Legal and Constitutional Committee. Event was attended by delegations of nine group member countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Macedonia, Poland, Slovakia and Romania), with Ukraine as an observer. Conference also got an excellent backing from UIHJ, which sent in two key representatives - president Mr. Leo Netten and director general Mrs. Francois Andrieux. Meeting was moderated by Eurodanube secretary Mr. Juraj Podkonicky.
 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Monday, 22 November 2010 10:41 |
Dear Mr and Ms Presidents, dear colleagues,
Enclosed you can find short questionnaire from Mr Peter Molnar, President of Slovak Judicial Officers Chambers, regarding enforcement in your countries. Mr Molnar asked me to send them to all Eurodanube members.
In the name of Eurodanube I would like to ask you for answering to these 4 questions in short way. Please send your answers back as soon as possible, max. in 14-days period. I will collect all your answers and send them to all our members.
Thank you very much for your co-operation.
Best regards
Juraj Podkonicky
Secretary
1. Is judicial officer in your country entitled to perform its activity in entire territory of the state or is his authority territorialy limited ? (if yes, please specify limitations)
2. Is it a right of creditor to choose a judicial officer who will be enforcing creditor´s claim or is it a court (or other state authority) who assign a case to a judicial officer for enforcement?
3. Is judicial officer in your country entitled to enforce also tax claims of (i) state authorities and (ii) territorial self-administration authorities? If yes, is judicial officer entitled to enforce these tax claims exclusively, or alongside of a state (or territorial self-administration) tax authority?
4. Is in your country as condition for appointment of judicial officer necessary to absolve successfully any kind of selection procedure?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 6 |
